FROM COLONIALISM TO THE FIRST WORLD WAR (1880S-1914) COLONIAL RIVALRY IN AFRICA
The development of capitalism in Europe led to the development of the industrial revolution which started in Britain in 1750 and by the end of the18th century Britain was the only industrialized nation in the world. However in the 19th century, other European countries such as France, Belgium, Germany and Italy also industrialized.
The industrialization of almost all European countries meant that there was no area to expand within European hence there was the need to find colonies. From 1870monopoly capitalism demanded for the following:-
ii. Raw materials iii. Cheap labor
iv. Investment areas
v. Areas to resettle surplus labor force.
Therefore the demands made capitalism to change to its monopolistic stage called imperialism. Colonialism was therefore linked with the development of capitalism in Europe, in the sense that it was undertaken to meet the demands of capitalism.
THE SCRAMBLE FOR AND PARTITION OF AFRICA
The scramble for Africa refers to the way European powers struggled among themselves to acquire colonies in Africa while the partition of Africa refers tothe different steps taken by the European powers to divide Africa into territories and fixing colonial boundaries.
The major European powers that were involved in this exercise were Britain, Germany, France, Portugal and Belgium.
By 1880’s it was only Africa which was not colonized therefore it became the centre of imperialist attention which was driven by the development of capitalism.
FACTORS THAT DETERMINED THE CONFIGURATION OR THE PATTERN OF THE SCRAMBLE FOR AND PARTITION OF AFRICA
During the scramble and partition of Africa; there were some areas that witnessed serious conflicts among theimperialist powersfor example the CongoNiger basin.
FACTORS THAT DETERMINED THE PATTERN OF THE SRAMBLE FOR AND PARTITION OF AFRICA
There were various factors that determined the pattern of the scramble for and partition of Africa.
1. Accessibility into the Interior of Africa.
The imperialist powers scrambled for those areas that offered means of transport into the interior of Africa. These powers were interested in the interior because they wanted raw materials and markets where they can sell their manufactured goods.
This explains why the Congo River was competed from the Belgium, France, and Portugal and the Niger River were competed for by France, Britain and Germany.
2. Strategic Factors.
This is one of the factors that determined the pattern of the scramble and thepartition of Africa. Britain controlled Egypt because of the Suez Canal which was used to transport raw materials and manufactured goods into and outside Africa.
Britain also controlled Uganda because it wanted to protect the source of river Nile which is found in Uganda.
3. Agricultural Potentialities.
The imperial powers struggled for areas that had fertile soils that could support the growth of cash crops. Various powers struggled for the Congo and Niger rivers because the areas around the rivers were very fertile and therefore suitablefor cash crop production.
4. Mineral Potentialities.
The imperials powers struggled for areas that had minerals in large quantities. Colonies such as Zimbabwe was very vital because it had large amounts of gold and diamond. Many imperialist powers were also interested in the Congo (DRC) because of the existence of large quantities of copper.
5. Population Presure
Population was one of the major factors that determined the nature of the scramble and partition of Africa. The colonial powers struggled for those areaswith high population because they ensured constant supply of cheap labor and ready markets for the European manufactured goods.
ESTABLISHMENT OF COLONIAL RULE OF AFRICA
The partitionof Africa marked the end of Africa’spolitical independence and the beginning of subjection to foreign rule. In the event of establishing colonial rule, the European powers used different methods depending on nature and attitudeof the nature population.
Sometimes the methods depended on the prevailing circumstances on theground such as geographical location of the colony.
THE TACTICS THAT WERE USED TO ESTABLISH COLONIAL RULE
The tactics that were used to establish colonial rule include the following:-(a) Treaty signing
(b) Use of military force(c) Alliances
(d) Gunbutt diplomacy (e) Mercenary technique(f) Berlin conference
1. Bogus/False Treaty Signing
This was one of the most common techniques that were used to establish colonial rule in Africa. The European powers urged African leaders to signtreaties with the European claiming to give protection against their local and foreign enemies.
Karl Peters signed treaties African chiefs in Tanganyika which put Tanganyika under German control and Moffat an Anglican Missionary encouraged Lobengula.
2. Use Of Military Force
Sometimes direct military confrontation was used to establish colonial rule in Africa. The military was used in areas that resisted the establishment of colonial rule.
The British used military force against the Nandi in Kenya and the Germans used force against the Hehe and Abushiri in Tanganyika.
The colonial powers used force because they were determined to establish their rulein Africa so as to exploit African resources.
This method was used in areas were two societies were in conflict, that is situation of enmity. The colonial powers allied with one society against theother one and then controlled all of them together.
In Tanganyika the German sided with Sango and Bena against Hehe and in central Africa, the British allied with chief Lewanika of lozi Kingdom against lobengula of the Ndebele people in Zimbabwe.
This led to the defect of Lobengula and the final colonization of Zimbabwe by theBritish
4. Gun Butt Diplomacy
This wasthe tactique where the colonial powers had threatened to use force but they did not actually use force. This method aimed at forcing African into submission. This method was used by British against King Jaja of Opobo inWest Africa.
5. Mercenary Technique
In this policy, colonial powers used Africans to establish their rule in Africa. Here they used people who had no blood ties with the people who are being invaded for example the Germansused the Rugarugain Tanganyika.
6. Berlin Conference
This was one of the methods used to establish colonial rule in Africa. This conference legalized the scramble for and partition of Africa. It laid down the principles that were to be followed when controlling Africa. One of the principles was effective occupation of African territories.
THE COLONIAL STATE
The colonial state refers to the extension of the metropolitan state in the colony. The colonial state was established immediately after scramble for and partition of Africa. It was followed by the establishment of the colonial economy.
The colonial state was an instrument of the colonialists and not the African masses. It was responsible for the exploitation and oppression of the colonies.
OBJECTIVES OF THE COLONIAL STATE
(a) To provide a link between the colonies and the metropolitan state. The colonial state was supposed to provide a link between the colonies and the metropolitan state. It had to ensure that the demands of the capitalists are satisfied suchas the acquisition of raw materials and markets.
(b)The colonial state was supposed to enforce laws and orders in the colony.
These laws were supposed to ensure that the interests of the capitalists are protected.Laws concerning land alienation and taxation were meant to ensure the exploitation of African resources.
(c) The colonial state was supposed to suppress or control African resistance against colonial.
The suppression of African resistance aimed at ensuring that there is a good atmosphere for the exploitation of African resources. This explains whyresistances such as Maji maji in Tanganyika and Nandi in Kenya had to be defeated at anycost.
(d)The colonial state was supposed to construct physical infrastructure such as roads and railways.
These establishments could not be established by individual capitalists thus it was the duty of the colonial state to establish them. The roads and railways facilitated the colonial economy by transporting raw materials and manufactured goods.
(e) The colonial state was supposed to supervise colonial production in the colonies.
The Africans in the colonies were supposed to produce cash crops and mineralsthat were needed in the metropolitan capitalist countries. Primarily the colonial economy was supposed to respond to the demands of the metropolitan economies.
(f) The colonial state was supposed to provide security and protection to the white settlers.
The colonial state established the judiciary, prisons and the police. The colonial state was imposed on the Africans thus it received state was imposed on the Africans thus it received resistance from the Africans, thus the colonial state had to ensure the safetyof theAfricans.
SIGNIFICANCE OF AGRICULTURE IN THE COLONIAL ECONOMY Significance of agriculture in colonial economy within African colonies may be seen from the advantages which colonialists got after the establishment of agriculture and to less extent Africans also benefited.
1. Agriculture led colonialists to get rawmaterials such as (cotton, tea, sisal, Pyrethrum, cocoa.etc) that were needed in their capitalists industries for more development.
2. Expansion of market for European manufactured goods such as Agricultural tools.
3. It destroyed African technology in order to avoid competition with African technology.
4. Facilitated exploitation of African resources for the benefit of European capitalist, resources being both human and natural resources.
5. Agriculture boosted the development of industries in Europe because industries operated nicely because of enough availability of raw materials.
6. Agriculture led to the construction of social services infrastructure like schools which prepared African elites such Mwl. Julius KambarageNyerere, Jomo Kenyatta and hospitals.Other physical infrastructures likeroads and railways were contracted for transporting raw material from productive areas to the coast to full fill the interests of capitalists.
HOW THE COLONIAL STATE WAS VIOLENT
The main objective of the colonial state was to establish the colonial economythat would respond to the demands of the metropolitan economies, in establishing such an economy. The colonialists used extreme violence and that is why many scholars such as Frants Fanon asserted that, the colonial statewas themost violent.
The colonial state used various measures to ensure that the needs of capitalism aremet; these measures show that the colonial state was violent.
(a) Colonial Conquest.
The colonial state used the military during the establishment of colonial rule. Those African societies that put up stiff resistance against the colonialists, the colonial state responded by using force e.g. Force was used by the British against the Nandi in Kenya and by the Germans against the Hehe in Tanganyika.
(b)Exploitation, which included
i. Introduction of Taxes.
The colonial state introduced taxes such as the pole and hut taxes as ways of getting revenue to run the colonies. The collection of these taxes was done in a very brutal manner. Those Africans who failed to pay taxes were usually flogged and some were even killed, these actions show the violent nature of the colonial state.
ii. Acquisition of Cheap Labour.
The colonial state used violent means to acquire labour. It introduced variouslabor laws in Africa to ensure constant supply of labor on economic enterprises; these labor laws include the Kipande system in Kenya and the pass laws in South Africa and Zimbabwe. When the Africans failed to provide labor, punishment was meted out.
iii. The colonial policy of land alienation was associated with use of violence.
Land alienation was supposed to create room for cash crop production and mining activities. The police used to force people away from their land so that it canbe used for colonial production.
(c) Suppression of African Resistance against the Colonial Economy. The colonial state used force to crash Africans, who resisted the establishment
of colonial economy. The colonial state used the military against the Nama-Herero resistance inNamibia and the Majimaji in Tanganyika.
(d)Destruction of African Traditional Industries.
The colonial state destroyed African traditional industries to ensure that Africa remains a producer of raw materials and a market for European manufactured goods. The destruction of these industries involved the use of force. E.g. in
Belgian Congo the colonial state decided it was illegal for Africans to engage in handcraft industries, those who are caught will have their hands chopped off.
(e) Distribution of Colonial Social Services.
The distribution of colonial social services such as education and healthinvolved the use of violence (psychological). These services were made availableonly in those areas where the production of raw materials took place. E.g. in Tanganyika there was mainly offered in Arusha, Morogoro etc. Those areas that had nothingto offer to the colonialists were danced education.
NOTE:-Given the above scenario; one rightly assets that the colonial state was the most violent or ruthless because it used the element of force to satisfy the interests of the capitalists in the metropolitan countries.
FACTORS WHICH DETERMINED THE INTRODUCTION OF DIFFERENT SYSTEM OF AGRICULTURE IN THE COLONIES.
1. Population Density.
Dense population made it difficult for and alienation to be practiced. Settler and plantation agriculture was impossible to develop, thus peasant agriculture was reinforced.
2. Nature of the existed State (Centralized or Decentralized).
Centralized and strong kingdoms were preferred for indirect rule and a peasant’s economy rather than settle and plantation system were introduced. These kingdoms proved to be on the establishment of settler agriculture. In this regard, peasant agriculture was introduced. The notable examples are Buganda and NorthernNigeria.
3. Nature and Interest of the Colonial Governors.
Different governors preferred peasant agriculture. For example, Governor Harry John stone of Uganda and Governors Horrace, Byatt and Sir Donald Cameroonof Tanganyika preferred peasant agriculture.
4. Territorial and Nationality Problems.
Before 1919, Tanganyika was ruled by Germans, but after the First World War, it was ruled by the British. Disagreements appeared regarding various issues of administration and the creation of a settler colony. Thus peasant agriculture dominated in many parts of Tanganyika.
5. Nature of Labour Supply
There was always a labour supply problem when the economy favored only one crop.
6. Nature of the Crops.
Certain crops such as cotton, coffee and cocoa needed great care and could not bemixed easily with other systems of agriculture.
7. Climate Condition.
Some areas were thought to be unfit for the European settlement as far as climate condition was concerned. The notable examples are Nigeria and Uganda. In these areas, peasant agriculture was encouraged.
8. In case for mandate territories after the World War II, colonies would be granted independence.
Therefore, no settle could be invited because they were preparing for majority rule. The notable examples are Tanganyika and Cameroon.
9. Nature of the Soil Fertility
Soil fertility favour plantation agriculture to cultivate different crops. Henceplantation agriculture encouraged fore example: Morogoro in Tanganyika.